| Method for calibrating an ultrasound flowmeter -> Monitor Keywords |
|
|
  Method for calibrating an ultrasound flowmeterUSPTO Application #: 20060236744Title: Method for calibrating an ultrasound flowmeter Abstract: A method for the dry calibration of an ultrasonic flow measuring device, wherein, on the basis of predetermined, geometric, production data of the flow measuring device, information concerning the theoretical flow of the medium through a measuring tube is won, actual geometric measurement data of the flow measuring device is three-dimensionally determined, on the basis of the actual geometric measurement data, information concerning the actual flow of the medium through the flow measuring device is won, and, on the basis of the information regarding the theoretical flow, and the actual flow, of the medium through the flow measuring device, a correction, or calibration, factor is determined for the flow measuring device. (end of abstract) Agent: Bacon & Thomas, PLLC - Alexandria, VA, US Inventors: Achim Wiest, Thomas Froehlich, Andreas Berger, Torsten Strunz USPTO Applicaton #: 20060236744 - Class: 073001340 (USPTO) Related Patent Categories: Measuring And Testing, Instrument Proving Or Calibrating, Volume Of Flow, Speed Of Flow, Volume Rate Of Flow, Or Mass Rate Of Flow, With Signal Processing, Span Or Set Point Adjustment (e.g., Zero Correction) The Patent Description & Claims data below is from USPTO Patent Application 20060236744. Brief Patent Description - Full Patent Description - Patent Application Claims
[0001] The invention relates to a method for calibrating an ultrasonic flow-measuring device. The ultrasonic flow-measuring device has at least one measuring tube, at least two ultrasonic sensors and a control/evaluation unit, wherein the ultrasonic sensors emit and/or receive ultrasonic measuring signals, and wherein the flow, e.g. flow rate, of a medium in the measuring tube is determined on the basis of the travel-time difference of the ultrasonic measuring signals traversing the measuring tube in the stream direction and counter to the stream direction. [0002] Due to tolerances in manufacture, flow measuring devices, especially ultrasonic flow measuring devices, must be calibrated, before being used. Known methods of calibration for ultrasonic flow-measuring devices rest on a so-called wet calibration, i.e. for the purpose of determining the calibration factor of the particular flow-measuring device, a very accurately defined amount of a medium is caused to flow through the measuring device to be calibrated. Depending on the diameter of the measuring tube of the flow-measuring device, relatively large amounts of medium must be readied for the wet calibration. Thus, the assignee has a calibration plant in Cernay, France, in which medium for calibration is stored in a 20 m high water tower. Using a revolver, the measuring tubes to be calibrated are brought into position for the medium to flow through. This plant can calibrate measuring tubes up to a diameter of 2000 mm. [0003] Apart from the high costs for the construction of such a calibration plant, a further problem arises, when the manufacture of the flow-measuring devices occurs at widely scattered production facilities. In order to avoid long transport distances and, therefore, long delivery times, a calibration plant must be placed near to each production facility. [0004] Major problems are presented also by the re-calibration of flow-measuring devices already installed in plants of customers. These devices must be extracted from their installed locations, re-calibrated in the calibration plant, and then brought back and installed again. [0005] An object of the invention is to provide a method for the theoretical, or dry, calibration of flow-measuring devices. [0006] The object is solved by a method including the following method steps: [0007] On the basis of predetermined, geometrical, production data of the flow-measuring device, information concerning the theoretical flow of the medium through the measuring tube is won; [0008] the actual, geometrical, measurement data of the flow-measuring device are determined three-dimensionally; [0009] on the basis of the actual, geometrical, measurement data, information concerning the actual flow of the medium through the flow-measuring device is won; and [0010] on the basis of the information regarding the theoretical flow, and the actual flow, of the medium through the flow-measuring device, a correction, or calibration, factor M is determined for the flow-measuring device. [0011] According to an advantageous, further development of the method of the invention, the actual, geometrical, measurement data are determined by a three-dimensional scanning. For example, the scanning of the flow-measuring device occurs by means of electromagnetic waves or by means of a mechanical scanning head. Corresponding scanning devices are available from the firm Faro Technologies, Inc. [0012] A preferred embodiment of the method of the invention provides that the flow-measuring device, or the measuring tube, is simulated by a mathematical model. Especially, the average inner cross section of the measuring tube is determined with high precision by the model. [0013] Additionally, in order to achieve a high accuracy, the following variables--as required, in various combinations--are considered in the mathematical model: [0014] a) the angles W1, W2 of incidence and emergence between ultrasonic sensors and the medium; [0015] b) the separations S1, S2 between two sound emitting surfaces, or two sound receiving surfaces, as the case may be, of the ultrasonic sensors, which alternately emit and receive; [0016] c) the radial separations H, F of the sound paths of the ultrasonic measuring signals of two ultrasonic sensors about the central axis of the measuring tube; [0017] d) the positions of the emitting and receiving surfaces of the ultrasonic sensors relative to the flowing medium or to the inner surface of the measuring tube; and [0018] e) the cross sectional area A of the section of the measuring tube lying between the two ultrasonic sensors and through which the medium flows. [0019] A preferred further development of the method of the invention provides that the actual, average cross sectional area of the measuring tube is determined by measuring the three-dimensional coordinates of a plurality of scanning points lying in at least two parallel cross sectional planes of the measuring tube lying transversely to the stream direction. Additionally, the three-dimensional coordinates of the sound emitting and receiving surfaces of the ultrasonic sensors are determined. [0020] Beyond this, an advantageous embodiment of the method of the invention provides that, for determining the three-dimensional coordinates of the midpoints of the corresponding sound emitting and receiving areas, a setup gage is used, in place of an ultrasonic sensor. Instead of the ultrasonic transducer in the form of e.g. a piezoelectric element, the setup gage has a specially embodied unit, which, in effect, simulates the ultrasonic transducer. If the three-dimensional scanning is done mechanically, then the setup gage has a cone-shaped element of defined shape. Especially is this cone-shaped element so embodied that the midpoint of a ball, which corresponds to the scanning head of the three-dimensional scanning device, lies in the midpoint of the sound emitting, or sound receiving, surface, as the case may be, of the corresponding ultrasonic sensor, upon its contacting of the cone. [0021] If the three-dimensional scanning is done electromagnetically, especially optically, then the setup gage has a correspondingly embodied reflector, e.g. a cat's eye reflector or a cube-corner reflector with three perpendicular surfaces. As actual measured value, which represents the exact position of the ultrasonic sensor, the coordinates of that position are stored, at which the radiation reflected from the reflector is maximum. [0022] On the basis of the angle of emergence, and the angle of incidence, of the sound, as well as on the basis of the actual, average, inner diameter of the measuring tube determined by the three-dimensional scanning, the sound path, and, therewith, the travel time of the ultrasonic measuring signals between two ultrasonic sensors, can be determined very accurately. In order to yet further reduce the measurement error that arises by application of the model, it is prudent to consider other disturbance variables. [0023] In the case of ultrasonic flow measuring devices, the flow of the medium through a measuring tube is determined by a time-of-flight measurement. To this end, the travel times t.sub.up(0) and t.sub.down(0) between the two ultrasonic sensors are measured in the stream direction and counter to the stream direction. [0024] The times are, however, still burdened with additional delay times t.sub.v, which are caused by the ultrasonic sensors, the cables and the electronics. These delay times must be subtracted from the travel times determined on the basis of the three-dimensional scanning. Therefore, one obtains for travel time in the medium the following values:t.sub.down(1)=t.sub.down(0)-t.sub.vt.sub.up(1)=t.sub.up(0)-t.sub.v By the three-dimensional scanning of the sound emitting and sound receiving surfaces and with knowledge of the delay time, the travel time, which the ultrasonic measuring signals require on the sound path S between two ultrasonic sensors can be determined very accurately. By comparing the theoretical travel time and the actually measured travel time, the velocity of sound in the medium, c.sub.Medium, can then be determined by the following formula, in which F(v) represents a velocity-dependent term, which depends on the ratio of the velocity of the medium to the sound velocity: c Medium = S 2 .times. ( 1 t up .function. ( 1 ) + 1 t down .function. ( 1 ) ) * F .function. ( v ) F(v) is equal to 1 for v=0, i.e., for v<<c.sub.Medium, F(v) is approximately equal to 1. [0025] Furthermore, the separation R/2 between the sound emitting, or sound receiving, as the case may be, surface of an ultrasonic sensor and the inner surface of the measuring tube is taken into consideration. It is assumed that, in this region of a given sound path, the flow velocity of the medium is at least approximately equal to zero. The corrected times t.sub.up and t.sub.down are given on the basis of the following formulas: t up = t up .function. ( 1 ) - R c Meduim [0026] The flow profile, which represents the radial dependence of the flow velocity of a medium in a measuring tube, looks very different, depending on whether the flow is laminar or turbulent. If the radial separation of a pair of ultrasonic sensors is known accurately from the three-dimensional scanning, then, with knowledge of the Reynolds number, a profile correction factor K can be calculated giving the ratio of the measured velocity to the average velocity v.sub.M of the medium:v=v.sub.M*K The theoretical flow is calculated as follows--for example, for the sound path 1--wherein L1 represents the length of the sound path, K1 the profile correction factor of the sound path 1, W1 the angle to the tube axis, t1.sub.up and t1.sub.down the travel times of the ultrasonic measuring signals for the sound path 1, and A the cross sectional area of the measuring tube: Q 1 = L .times. .times. 1 2 * cos .function. ( W .times. .times. 1 ) * A * K .times. .times. 1 * ( 1 t .times. .times. 1 down - 1 t .times. .times. 1 up ) The measurement becomes yet greater in accuracy, when a plurality of sound paths are present at different separations from the central axis of the measuring tube. Depending on the separation of the ultrasonic sensors from the central axis of the measuring tube, the travel times are weighted with wi on the basis of the following formula: Q calculated = n .times. w i * Q i Via the ratio of the individual velocities at different separations of the sound paths from the middle of the tube, the velocity profile of the medium can be determined. With the help of these measured values, the flow can be still better captured, also corrected, in the critical velocity region between pure laminar flow and turbulent flow. In the mathematical model, the measured values won by the three-dimensional scanning are used. These deviate usually from the predetermined manufacturing measured data. The determined correction factor M then describes the measure for the deviation, or individual calibration factor, of the ultrasonic flow measuring device. This calibration factor is stored in the ultrasonic flow measuring device and enters subsequently into the determination of flow. [0027] The invention will now be explained in greater detail on the basis of the drawings, the figures of which show as follows: [0028] FIG. 1 a perspective view of an ultrasonic flow measuring device; [0029] FIG. 2 a cross section through the ultrasonic flow measuring device of FIG. 1; [0030] FIG. 3 a longitudinal section taken according to the cutting plane A-A of FIG. 2; [0031] FIG. 4 a section taken according to the cutting plane B-B of FIG. 3; and [0032] FIG. 5 a side view of the setup gage of the invention. [0033] FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an ultrasonic flow measuring device 1 with two sound paths, i.e. two measuring channels. The two pairs of ultrasonic sensors 3, 4; 5, 6 are preferably arranged at positions of about 50% of the radius of the measuring tube 2. For a two beam arrangement of ultrasonic sensors 3, 4; 5, 6, this positioning is of advantage, since, in such case, flow velocity is relatively largely independent of the Reynolds number, or the viscosity, of the medium. Continue reading... Full patent description for Method for calibrating an ultrasound flowmeter Brief Patent Description - Full Patent Description - Patent Application Claims Click on the above for other options relating to this Method for calibrating an ultrasound flowmeter patent application. ###  How KEYWORD MONITOR works... a FREE service from FreshPatents1. Sign up (takes 30 seconds). 2. Fill in the keywords to be monitored. 3. Each week you receive an email with patent applications related to your keywords. Start now! - Receive info on patent apps like Method for calibrating an ultrasound flowmeter or other areas of interest. ### Previous Patent Application: Heavy-duty pex clamp installation tool Next Patent Application: Impact sensor and method for testing the same Industry Class: Measuring and testing ### FreshPatents.com Support Thank you for viewing the Method for calibrating an ultrasound flowmeter patent info. IP-related news and info Results in 1.92117 seconds Other interesting Feshpatents.com categories: Electronics: Semiconductor , Audio , Illumination , Connectors , Crypto , |
||
