| Golf club having a cam-locked insert -> Monitor Keywords |
|
Golf club having a cam-locked insertGolf club having a cam-locked insert description/claimsThe Patent Description & Claims data below is from USPTO Patent Application 20080153619, Golf club having a cam-locked insert. Brief Patent Description - Full Patent Description - Patent Application Claims This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/860,207, filed Nov. 21, 2006, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. BACKGROUND1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates generally to a golf club, and more particularly, to a golf putter having a replaceable striking surface attachment. 2. Background of the Invention Most golfers recognize that putting with accurate direction and distance requires a club that communicates a precise sense of touch and feel. The desire to maximize this precise touch and feel and to accurately control the direction of the ball has spawned literally hundreds of golf putter designs. Examples of these various designs include increased putter head mass to accommodate short backswings and lengthen ball travel, balanced putter head mass to improve directional accuracy, decreased putter head mass to increase accuracy, and special putter face striking surfaces that impart a heightened sense of feel and touch in controlling the rebound characteristics of the ball. This last aspect, concerning putter face striking surfaces, is the subject of the present application. Golfers typically favor customized golf clubs that enhance, improve, or correct their particular style of play. For manufacturers, this customizing presents a significant challenge, especially when attempting to sell golf clubs to the mass market at competitive prices. With putters, manufacturers have experimented extensively with offering varieties of putter striking surfaces to accommodate personal preferences for club feel and touch. Thus far, manufacturers have offered two principal ways to purchase customized golf putters: 1) one-time customization, in which the manufacturer typically offers a full line of putters with basic designs, but with a variety of striking surfaces designed to appeal to diverse tastes; and 2) adjustable customization, in which a manufacturer typically offers a multi-component putter with a putter head that accepts a variety of interchangeable striking surface attachments, each suitable for different playing styles or playing conditions. The ultimate goal of each of these customization methods is to give the golfer a specialized feel and control that will persuade the golfer to purchase the customized putter instead of a non-customized putter. In addition to appealing to golfers' desire for customized clubs, some putters attempt to conform to United States Golf Association (USGA) rules to be acceptable for USGA sanctioned play. For customized putters featuring varying striking surfaces or varying attachments, manufacturers desiring USGA conformance must pay particular attention to the USGA rules concerning the attachment of club components and the adjustability of clubs. Specifically, Appendix II.1.a of the USGA rules states that “all parts of the club shall be fixed so that the club is one unit, and it shall have no external attachments except as otherwise permitted by the Rules.” Concerning adjustability, Appendix II.1.b.ii of the USGA rules, adopted to accommodate multi-component putters, states that all methods of adjustment require that “all adjustable parts are firmly fixed and there is no reasonable likelihood of them working loose during a round.” For one-time customized putters, these rules are typically no obstacle because construction of the club is completed and fixed at the factory, i.e., the club has a fixed face. For adjustable customized putters, however, the multi-components sometimes are not firmly fixed nor positively locked and can have a tendency to work loose and/or fail to deliver the feel and performance of firmly fixed components. Turning to examples of the two types of customized putters, U.S. Pat. No. 5,458,332 to Fisher and U.S. Pat. No. 5,531,439 to Azzarella disclose one-time customized fixed-face golf putter heads having recesses into which inserts are wedged and permanently fitted. In addition, U.S. Pat. No. 5,674,132 to Fisher also discloses an insert wedged into the recess of a golf putter head, but also adds an adhesive layer that securely holds the wedge insert within the recess. In adding this adhesive layer, U.S. Pat. No. 5,674,132 teaches that the adhesive helps to avoid the loosening of the insert by repeated contact of the insert bottom with the ground, during normal usage of the club. However, these one-time customized striking surface putters do not accommodate the desire to fine-tune the putter or to quickly change striking surfaces for varied playing conditions. In other words, if a striking surface is attached to a putter head by a wedged, permanent fit or a wedged fit with adhesive, the striking surface is not quickly removable. To address this desire to repeatedly change striking surfaces, the adjustable customization designs incorporate multi-component putter heads with replaceable parts, e.g., striking surface inserts or striking surface attachments. Applicant's U.S. Pat. No. 5,332,214 discloses a golf putter that includes a multi-component head having an elastomeric striking surface, a support member for the elastomeric striking surface, a weight, a body member, and screws. The body member includes a recessed area extending substantially across the front of the body member, a central cavity extending through the body member for receiving the weight and holes through the body member for receiving the screws. The support member includes holes for receiving the screws when the support member is fitted into the recessed area. The elastomeric striking surface is cast or adhesively secured to the support member, together making a striking surface insert. Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 4,121,832 to Ebbing, U.S. Pat. No. 5,690,562 to Sturm, U.S. Pat. No. 5,746,664 to Reynolds, Jr., U.S. Pat. No. 5,839,974 to McAllister, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,921,871 to Fisher all disclose golf putters having an insert fastened to a putter head using threaded screws. Each of these designs uses screws to firmly fix and positively secure the components of the putter head in a manner similar to that taught by applicant's U.S. Pat. No. 5,332,214 and determined by the USGA to be in conformance with its rules. Unfortunately, this use of screws complicates adjusting of the club by requiring tools and frustrates the golfer's ability to quickly fine-tune his putter or to easily adapt the club for varying playing conditions. In the end, golfers typically make a one-time adjustment after the purchase of the club and forgo attempts to customize the club before playing. Thus, if a striking surface is attached to a putter head using a screw, the striking surface is not quickly removable. In an attempt to simplify adjustable customization, other types of removable insert golf putters teach interference fits in lieu of screws. However, in each case the fit is either poorly secured or secured so tightly that further adjustment is impossible. As an example of a poorly secured fit, U.S. Pat. No. 5,542,675 to Micciche et al. discloses an adaptor that snaps onto the putter head, providing an elastomeric striking surface for the putter head. Micciche explains that the putter head adaptor is “adapted to engage” around the putter head, but fails to disclose how the adaptor engages the putter head or how loose or rattling fits, caused by variances in manufacturing such as shrinkage and inconsistent dimensions, are avoided. U.S. Pat. No. 5,620,381 to Spalding discloses a removable putting face insert having a resilient rear wedge portion that is sized and positioned to press fit within a recess of the putter head. However, Spalding specifically teaches that the press fit arrangement is tight enough such that alteration of the club by a golfer is virtually impossible. U.S. Pat. No. 5,718,644 to Donofrio discloses a putter head that can retain an insert by frictional fit, However, Donofrio specifically contemplates that the insert is permanently attached and impossible to remove, and actually prefers the use of high strength epoxy for the permanent attachment, or alternatively, welding, brazing, bolts, screws, integral latches, or other mechanical fasteners. Thus, if a striking surface is attached to a putter head using high strength epoxy, welding, brazing, bolts, screws, or integral latches as a permanent attachment, the striking surface is not quickly removable. In another attempt at adjustable customization, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,690,561 and 5,688,190 to Rowland et al. disclose the removable application of textured adhesive backed pads to a club face. However, the use of temporary adhesive will over time fail to provide a positive lock as the effectiveness of the adhesive deteriorates with use. Thus, conventional adjustable customized golf putters fail to satisfy golfers' preferences for easily customizing or fine-tuning the putter to adapt to changing playing styles or changing playing conditions. Putters fastened with screws or similar fasteners can require tools and can prolong replacement of the striking surface insert such that a golfer experimenting with different inserts loses the unique feel of the prior inserts. In short, the striking surface inserts of these types of putters are not quickly removable. In addition, the golfer can lose the screws or similar fasteners, making the club useless. Although simplifying adjustment, the conventional adjustable customized putters that use interference fits or temporary adhesive also fail to positively secure the insert. The interference fits fail, in part, due to the many variables in manufacturing, including shrinkage and process variations that contribute to inconsistent shapes and dimensions. The consequence of this inconsistency is an undesirable looseness. Likewise, the temporary adhesives do not provide a positive lock and, in addition, deteriorate over time. As used herein, “looseness” is defined by any independent movement of a club component perceptible to a golfer while using the club to strike a ball. Perceptible includes feeling or hearing independent movement. For example, feeling or hearing a rattle is indicative of looseness. Looseness in a putter prevents replication of the feel of a fixed face putter, and prevents even acceptable performance of the putter. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONThe present invention is an adjustable customized golf club that positively locks a striking surface attachment to a club head and provides for the quick replacement of the striking surface attachment. The representative embodiment of the golf club is a golf putter. However, as one of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate, the present invention applies equally well to other types of golf clubs, such as wedges, drivers, fairway woods, and irons. According to the representative embodiment, the primary components of the putter include a putter head, a striking surface attachment, and one or more lock fittings. The striking surface attachment is fixed to a front face of the putter head by the one or more lock fittings. With one lock fitting, the present invention positively locks the striking surface attachment to the putter head without looseness. As used herein, to “positively lock” or to “provide a positive lock” means to firmly fix a club component without looseness as if it were part of a fixed-face putter, while still allowing quick removal and replacement of the component. In a representative embodiment, a player can break the positive lock by hand and without the use of tools to remove and replace a component, such as the striking surface attachment. As used herein, “toolless” and “toollessly” refer to this removing and replacing of components without the use of tools. Also, as used herein, a “tool” refers to a device that is primarily designed to join or separate components, and, specifically, does not include a golf tee, coin, key (e.g., a house key or car key), ball mark repairer, or other similar devices that are intended merely to assert force on a component for disassembly in places not accessible by hand. A positive lock releasably bonds components, but does not create a permanent attachment such as is typically found between a club shaft and club head. In contrast to a positive lock, a permanent attachment can only be broken by a destructive force that damages the components. Also, as used herein, the terms “quick” and “quickly,” when used in relation to removing, replacing, or attaching a component, e.g., a striking surface attachment, encompass actions completed with speed and without delay, such that, for example, a typical player does not lose the feel of a prior component configuration, i.e., does not forget how the prior component configuration felt. Examples of component attachments that satisfy this criteria include a component that magnetically bonds to another component; a component that hooks to or onto another component; a component that compresses into or out of another component; a component that stretches around another component; a component that slides into, over, around, or on another component; a component that snaps into, over, around, or on another component; a component that wedges inside or around another component; a component that clips into, over, around, or on another component; a component that rolls into, over, around, or on another component; a component that twists into, over, around, or on another component; a component that swells or expands into or around another component; a component that grips onto, around, or over another component; and a component that rotates into engagement with another component. In contrast, examples of component attachments that do not satisfy the criteria of “quick” and “quickly” include a wedged, permanent fit, a wedged fit with adhesive, and an attachment using screws. Of course, components that can only be separated by a destructive force, such as with the permanent fit or the wedged fit with adhesive, do not satisfy the criteria of “quick”and “quickly.” When multiple lock fittings fix the striking surface attachment to the putter head, a first preferred embodiment of the present invention includes at least a primary lock fitting and a secondary lock fitting. The primary lock fitting releasably secures the striking surface attachment to the front face of the putter head and provides the strong, tight fit required to eliminate looseness. The secondary lock fitting can also contribute to the strong, tight fit, but at a minimum retains and aligns the striking surface attachment in the putter head before the primary lock fitting positively locks the striking surface attachment to the putter head. Continue reading about Golf club having a cam-locked insert... Full patent description for Golf club having a cam-locked insert Brief Patent Description - Full Patent Description - Patent Application Claims Click on the above for other options relating to this Golf club having a cam-locked insert patent application. ### 1. Sign up (takes 30 seconds). 2. Fill in the keywords to be monitored. 3. Each week you receive an email with patent applications related to your keywords. Start now! - Receive info on patent apps like Golf club having a cam-locked insert or other areas of interest. ### Previous Patent Application: Golf swing training system, method and device Next Patent Application: Golf club with flexible grip portion Industry Class: Games using tangible projectile ### FreshPatents.com Support Thank you for viewing the Golf club having a cam-locked insert patent info. IP-related news and info Results in 0.34724 seconds Other interesting Feshpatents.com categories: Novartis , Pfizer , Philips , Polaroid , Procter & Gamble , 174 |
* Protect your Inventions * US Patent Office filing
PATENT INFO |
|