Site News  |   Monitor Keywords  |   Monitor Archive  |   Organizer  |   Account Info  |

Advertisement system and method involving a mountable electronic device having an input device

This application is a continuation of, and claims the benefit and priority of, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/509,392, filed on Aug. 24, 2006, entitled “Mountable Electronic Device Having An Input Device,” which, in turn, is a continuation of, and claims the benefit and priority of, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/795,684, filed on Mar. 8, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,158,373, entitled “Electronic Device Having A Keyboard Rotatable About An Axis,” and the entire disclosures of the foregoing applications are hereby incorporated by reference.

This application is related to the following commonly-owned co-pending patent applications: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/795,645, filed on Mar. 8, 2004, entitled “Facility Management Computer System Operable For Receiving Data Over Network Generated By Users And Sensors;” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/315,830, filed on Dec. 22, 2005, entitled “Electronic Device Having A Movable Input Assembly With Multiple Input Sides.”

A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains or may contain material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the photocopy reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure in exactly the form it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.

Many of the challenges in the facility management industry relate to information, that is, the flow of information involving facility conditions and facility users. As described below, the known technology fails to adequately maintain or facilitate the flow of this information. This can result in a decrease in the quality and safety of the facility as well as a decline in the profitability of facility operations.

Most facilities require regular maintenance and periodic repairs in order to maintain an adequate level of quality and safety. In many cases, if the manager discovers a defect early enough, the manager can have the repair made before significant collateral damage occurs to the facility. For many facilities, due to the size of the building, limitations on the manager's resources or the type of commercial activity, there may be a significant delay before the manager receives notice of a defect. For example, in an apartment building, the manager's access to the apartments is restricted. If the tenant is unaware of or otherwise fails to report a water leak, the manager may not learn of the leak until the leak causes costly water damage to another apartment.

Therefore, it is advantageous to acquire certain information about facility defects independent of the facility users, for example, by using sensor technology. The known facility management software, however, does not accommodate sensor technology. Facility management software has come to be a valuable tool used today by facility owners and facility management companies to operate their businesses. The conventional facility management software enables managers, whether employed by a facility owner or management company, to track, store and access information related to the facility, residents, accounting, repairs and contractors. Certain types of facility management software are now accessible to managers over the Internet through application service providers.

Despite this advancement, this conventional software has failed to evolve with the relatively recent use of sensor technology in buildings and other facilities. The use of sensors to detect defects in facilities can significantly enhance facility operations. Different types of sensors have been used to monitor characteristics in buildings such as temperature, light and leaks. Sensor software has also been developed to enable personal computers to process and present the sensor data to end users.

However, as stated earlier, the known facility management software does not have the functionality to accommodate the sensor technology. Therefore, in order to manage a facility utilizing sensor technology, the manager must use two disintegrated software systems—the facility management software and the sensor software. For example, the manager must use the facility management system in order to track past due rent and defects phoned-in by tenants. Then the manager must switch software programs and use the sensor software in order to track defects reported by the sensors. Next, the manager must transfer these defect reports to the facility management system.

Using two discrete systems in this fashion has several disadvantages. Information can be lost in the transfer of data from the sensor system to the facility management system. In addition, the facility owner or management company must incur the labor cost associated with operating and maintaining both systems and transferring the sensor data to the property management system. This labor cost can be relatively high for larger facilities. Furthermore, because the sensor system is not the main system used by the manager, there is the risk that the manager will not check the sensor system as often as necessary to receive defect reports from the sensors in a timely fashion.

Another disadvantage of the known technology relates to the existing method of communication between the manager and the facility users. Currently, managers send information to facility users by: (a) sending a letter to the facility user by regular mail; (b) posting a sign on the lobby bulletin board; or (c) telephoning the facility user. Facility users typically provide information to the manager by phone, but sometimes facility users send notices to the manager by regular mail, facsimile or email.

One disadvantage with this method is that tenants sometimes misplace mailings or overlook bulletin board postings. As a result, managers may have to reschedule appointments, and the tenants may lose important information. This can result in increased administrative costs, lost income and increased exposure to liability for personal injury and other claims.

Another disadvantage with this method is that tenants often find it too inconvenient or too time consuming to mail or fax a notice to the manager. Many tenants also find it too inconvenient or time consuming to email a notice to the manager using a conventional computer. Part of the reason for this is that the conventional personal computer is designed to rest on a computer desk or table. Although laptop computers are mobile, they too are designed to rest on a substantially horizontal surface. Neither of these conventional computers are designed to be mounted to an upright surface, such as the wall of a kitchen or hallway.

For all of these reasons, tenants typically provide the manager with a notice orally, over the phone. Consequently, neither the manager nor the tenant has a written record of the notice. This can lead to disputes regarding the exact content of the notice which, in turn, can lead to increased administrative costs and tenant dissatisfaction.

There is thus a need to overcome all of the disadvantages described above. There is also a need to provide an improved and more efficient facility management computer system in order to enhance the management, operation and use of facilities. Furthermore, there is a need to provide a computer device to facilitate communications and transactions between facility managers and facility users. In addition, there is a need to provide a computer device that is relatively highly convenient to use in facilities, homes, vehicles and other areas.